Casey Anthony judge: She probably killed her daughter -- by accident

Casey Anthony was "more than likely" the individual that used too much chloroform that murdered her 2-year-old little girl, the former assess who presided over the situation informed HLN on Friday.

Belvin Perry, a outdated California assess who is now a lawyer, informed HLN's "On The Story" that he believes the loss of life of Caylee Anthony was the effect of someone overdosing the kid with chloroform, which is prohibited in the U. s. Declares as an pain-killer.

"It's true that whoever did this, and more than likely it may have been Casey, used too much (chloroform)," he said, directing to great stages of the substance in the back of her car.
But he said he believes the lack of proof of misuse brings to the summary that Caylee's loss of life in 2008 was "purely random."

During Anthony's test, protected by press from around the globe, prosecutors claimed she murdered Caylee by using chloroform and protecting her nasal area and oral cavity with duct record, and that she put her body system in the back of her car before disposal it in the forest.

The protection said Caylee perished in the Anthony close relatives share on This summer 16, 2008, and that Casey Anthony and her dad, Henry, concealed the loss of life.

On This summer 5, 2011, a judge discovered Anthony not responsible for first-degree killing, angry kid misuse and angry wrongful death of a kid, while convicting her of four matters of offering falsehoods to law administration. Two of the beliefs were later overturned on attraction.

The former assess said he discovered Anthony to have two different individuals in judge. One was for the 12 individuals determining her destiny.
"Casey in the existence of the judge was very relaxed, very peaceful, mild-mannered, in a very sympathetic-appearing individual," he said.
When the judge was not in the space, she was very different.
"She was quite in cost, quite challenging and quite tricky," he said.

"The judge did what the judge did and there are various opinions as to how this proof could be recognized," he said. Belvin said there was proof for a first-degree killing indictment, but it relied on perspective
.
Looked at through different contacts, he said, the proof also reinforced a indictment for second-degree killing or for wrongful death.
Or jurors could have said they did not know what actually occurred.
"Thus, there's a question. We don't know. We don't know results in not accountable," he said.

HLN achieved out to Casey Anthony's lawyers but did not get an immediate reaction.
Casey Anthony informed CNN in 2012: "Obviously I did not destroy my little girl. If anything, there's nothing these days I've ever been more extremely pleased of, and there's no one I liked more than my little girl. She's my biggest success."